The first month with five Wednesdays since the new blog launched, which was this last August, I decided on the spur of the moment to ask my readers to propose a topic for the fifth post of the month, and a substantial plurality of them asked for a discussion of reincarnation, which they duly got.
Alcoholism can affect anyone. It has enormous costs as it pertains to societies, families, and individuals. It is not prejudicial towards any race, color, sex, religion, or economic level.
Although we do have ideas as to what alcoholism is, what we do not know is the exact cause s of this problem. Researchers are continually seeking answers to the long-standing nature versus nurture debate. Different views are split between a biological paradigm and a physchological paradigm.
No one explanation seems to be better than another is. I will present views of the effects alcoholism has on society and an insight to the factors that serve to fuel the nature or nurture debate concerning alcohol abuse and alcoholism.
Alcohol deaths account for approximately five percent of all deaths occurring in the United States. Alcohol is considered to be one of the most widely used drugs as it attacks the central nervous system.
Two-thirds of all adults drink alcohol; one-third of those are under the age of eighteen. The term alcoholic is commonly used to refer to a person who is severely dependent on alcohol as a result of their drinking pattern.
Not everyone with an alcohol problem becomes an alcoholic. If this is true then what differentiates the social drinker from the alcoholic? A novice explanation would be that social drinkers do not experience problems when they drink, however alcoholics develop a physical dependence on alcohol and lack control over how much they drink and what happens when they drink, resulting in social problems.
Can it be this simple? Why doesn't a person just stop drinking when they notice that their lives are in a downward spiral? It has taken society and the medical community a long time to consider alcoholism as a disease.
This may be in part because alcohol is used primarily for recreational or social purposes and is not viewed as something that cannot be controlled. Styles of drinking and attitudes toward alcohol vary across cultures. In cultural groups such as the Chinese, Greeks and Italians, drinking are maintained by social customs.
Children are introduced to alcohol at an early age, but are not associated with masculinity or social power. The abuse of alcohol is looked upon with strong disapproval.
Conversely the American experience is just the opposite. In colonial America habitual drunkenness was not considered to be an uncontrollable disease. In those days drinking was a social activity that took place in a close-knit family environment.
But during the early s drinking moved into the male dominated saloons and alcohol became a symbol of masculine independence and violence. At this point, the rates of alcoholism began to increase dramatically. This was the first sign of what was to become 19th century America's view that habitual drinkers were unable to control their drinking.
These early warnings would eventually lead to alcoholism being recognized as a disease. Several studies have confirmed that some chronic drinkers can still maintain control even when intoxicated.
It is believed this is because when directed towards a goal such as job, family, etc. The problem with these studies is that while these chronic drinkers may be able to control their drinking, they are unable to guarantee when they can do so. They soon lose the ability to distinguish social drinking from drinking as a social crutch.
As a result these chronic drinkers eventually break promises and commitments to their families and employers. In order for alcohol to become a contributor to alcohol addiction, a person must first use the 'drug' and continue to use the drug.
What constitutes use from abuse with alcohol cannot clearly be distinguished. This is because alcohol taken in various amounts affects individuals differently. Some people may be considered an alcohol abuser early in their drinking experiences because of the adverse consequences they go through. From the early days that alcoholism was discovered to be a problem there has been a long-standing debate as to how one becomes an alcoholic?According to Wikipedia the nature versus nurture debates concern the relative importance of an individual’s innate qualities (“nature”, i.
e. nativism, or innatism) versus personal experiences (“nurture”, i. e. empiricism or behaviorism) in determining or causing individual differences in .
Nature vs. Nurture Essay. The nature versus nurture debate is one of the oldest issues in sociology (Davidson, , n.p.). The debate centers on the relative contributions of genetics and environmental factors to human behavior (Davidson, , n.p.).
BibMe Free Bibliography & Citation Maker - MLA, APA, Chicago, Harvard. The nature versus nurture debate is an ongoing debate focusing on how much our environment (nurture) and our genes (nature) affect us as human beings.
Twin studies (studies involving twins) help to determine the importance of environmental and genetic . Essay on Alcoholism Nature vs Nurture Argument Words | 12 Pages.
Alcoholism and the Nature vs. Nurture Argument Does the environment that one grows up in contribute to alcoholism or is alcoholism determined by genetics?
Nurture or Nature? It is really doubtful if alcoholism is a result of nature or nurture, but whatever it doesn’t matter at all, because the only important thing is how to quit it.